tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27793152.post3701252569715611477..comments2023-08-27T06:40:49.487-07:00Comments on G.R. Nylander Photography: A Closer Look: D3X and 4 x 5Gary Nylanderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15843607225237788027noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27793152.post-81669032396140181242010-01-28T14:16:16.250-08:002010-01-28T14:16:16.250-08:00Nice comparison, enjoyed reading it. Although mys...Nice comparison, enjoyed reading it. Although myself and everyone I showed the pictures to could pick out the Tachihara images quite easily.<br /><br />It's obvious to me which is which, the Tachihara has much better depth of field. While the D3x maintains a better balance between highlights and shadows.Kwon Ekstromnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27793152.post-77093651439518475352009-04-26T19:28:00.000-07:002009-04-26T19:28:00.000-07:00Hi Mark,
I thought it was a fun comparison to do,...Hi Mark,<br /><br />I thought it was a fun comparison to do, I'm sure that one could squeeze a bit more detail out of the D3X files.....I will have to hold out too before I buy a D3X, unless I win the lottery !<br /><br />GaryGary Nylanderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15843607225237788027noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27793152.post-85381014901536853472009-04-26T15:54:00.000-07:002009-04-26T15:54:00.000-07:00Very interesting comparisons. I guess on first lo...Very interesting comparisons. I guess on first look the MF samples look sharper and more detailed to me, but I am wondering if it is more a function of the increased contrast.<br /><br />I would guess if the D3X files were processed a bit more they would be nearly identical. As much as I would like to play with one myself, I am afraid the expense will have me holding out for its little cousin whenever it comes due.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08324591166838241161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27793152.post-73275756783716126952009-04-10T21:45:00.000-07:002009-04-10T21:45:00.000-07:00Yes I was really amazed by the results, especially...Yes I was really amazed by the results, especially with the prints its really hard to tell.....Gary Nylanderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15843607225237788027noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27793152.post-21302743640569836202009-04-10T21:43:00.000-07:002009-04-10T21:43:00.000-07:00Wonderful, rich images either way, but impressive ...Wonderful, rich images either way, but impressive that the Nikon can hang in there.Chris Klughttp://patternsoflightndark.com/wordpress/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27793152.post-23202995036728594622009-04-10T21:28:00.000-07:002009-04-10T21:28:00.000-07:0016 x 20 print: "A" is the 4 x 5 and "B" is the D3X...16 x 20 print: "A" is the 4 x 5 and "B" is the D3X<BR/><BR/>20 x 24 print: "A" is D3X and "B" is the 4 x 5<BR/><BR/>100% crop: "A" is the 4 x 5 and "B" is the D3XGary Nylanderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15843607225237788027noreply@blogger.com