Ice on Powers Creek

Here is an image I made in November of 2007 during the first really cold days of the fall season where the water from Powers creek had partially frozen. The trail to Powers Creek is not far from my home and I had been in the area the previous day during a walk, but I only had my point and shoot camera, so I went back the next day with my view camera to make some images of the interesting ice formations.

The Nature of Photography Show

The above title of this post is the name of the show that I am pleased to be taking part of with two other B.C. photographers, Dave Hutchison and Isabelle Groc at Sooke Harbour House, 1528 Whiffen Spit Road, Sooke, B.C. during the month of May. Opening reception for the exhibit is Sunday May 3rd from 1 to 4 p.m. My work is of course all black and white while the fine work of Dave's and Isabelle's work is in color and of course everything is of a nature theme. If you happen to be travelling to the Island , please do take the time to check out the beautiful west coast including Sooke, Jordan Rive and Port Renfrew and stop in at Sooke Harbour House, the place is absolutely spectacular. The posted image has been shown several times on this blog, its one of the featured images of the show, I made the image in October of 2003 at South Beach in Pacific Rim National Park after a day of typical west coast or should I say "wetcoast" weather, shot on 4 x 5 film, 120mm lens.

A Closer Look: D3X and 4 x 5

Chris Klug posted a response to my previous blog post regarding my comparison between a Nikon D3X and a 4 x 5 view camera. He asked if I could post some larger versions, so to the best of my ability here they are: cropped sections from files to make 16 x 20 and 20 x 24 equivalent prints, and a 100% crop from the file for a 20 x 24-inch print. Keep in mind that these files are at 72 dpi for the web. If you want to know which camera is which "A" or "B", read my comment to my own post here.

One other thing I should mention that I forgot to mention in my previous post, the second set of images of the ice-covered pond was taken with my 270 mm lens on my 4 x 5 and on Michael's camera, the lens was set to 70 mm.

Update: Here is a link to my review of my Nikon D850 and my 4x5 view camera.

Nikon D3X vs. 4 x 5 View Camera

Back in August of last year, I did a Nikon D3 comparison with my Tachihara 4 x 5 field camera, in which I collaborated with fine art photographer and friend, Michael Breakey. When Michael said he had a Nikon D3X on order, we both thought it would be fun to repeat the test, as we had good fun with the first test. First off a disclaimer here, this is not meant to be an in-depth pixel vs. pixel duel to the death test, our test is not nearly that complicated, we just thought it would be fun to get out with our perspective cameras and make some photographs, okay actually just an excuse to get out and photograph on a sunny spring day after a long winter if the truth be told. So with that, we headed out on a recent Sunday morning in Kelowna's Mission Creek Regional Park where we hunted around for some good picture possibilities that would help showcase the best of each camera.


We looked for scenes with lots of detail, to help showcase what each camera was capable of producing, I shot in black and white (T-Max 400 rated @ iso 200) and Michael shot in colour at iso 200 later to be converted to black and white in Photoshop CS3. Michael shot with a 24 to 70mm Nikkor zoom (the latest lens) set at about 30mm, I shot with my good old trusty Schneider 120mm f5.6 lens, Michael also set his D3X to 5:4 crop mode, thus giving the same aspect ratio as my 4 x 5, although this did downsize Michael's 24 megapixels file size down to about 20 megapixels or so, still a decent size file. We made pictures of a forest scene with backlighting and also a half frozen pond with high key lighting reflecting off the ice surface. After we finished clicking the shutters on our cameras we headed back to Michael's "lab" i.e.: his computer war room where we downloaded the massive D3X files, I then headed home to my lab to download my "files" i.e.: develop the film. Once the film processing job was done I scanned my images on my Microtek M1 scanner (about a max of 5x enlargement) and made 13 x 19 inch prints from my Epson 4800 printer, these prints by the way were cropped sections which would be the equivalent of prints up to 20 x 24 inches in size.


It just so happens that I had a speaking engagement at the Central Okanagan Photographic Society meeting this past Tuesday evening, what better place to bring these prints and ask the members which were shot with which camera without telling them which was which, a blind vision test so to speak. So after my presentation was completed (I talked about my black and white work) I spread these prints out on a table and asked people to have a look and see what they thought. With prints made to the equivalent of 16 x 20 it was almost impossible to tell which came from which camera, most people were not able to tell me what camera made what picture, some were able to figure of the 4 x 5 images from the 20 x 24 equivalent size prints, but only after having their nose several inches away from the print.


In conclusion, I would have to say that this D3X is a great camera, I thought it was interesting to see just how good some of the latest digital technology is. For a closer look at the image differences, please go to my next post of April 10th, 2009, thanks.

Update: Here is a review of my Nikon D850 and my 4x5 view camera.